Devalok
How a tradition frames it · 1 telling · Pan-India

How scholars explain Shiva's rise

Who is in it

The story, beat by beat

  1. Scholars treat the Shiva of today as a figure merged from several older gods rather than one continuous cult.
  2. The Vedic Rudra, marginal in the Rigveda and possibly non-Vedic in root, is the named ancestor.
  3. In the Shvetashvatara Upanishad Rudra becomes the one Lord.
  4. Local gods across India were folded into Shiva by adding the suffix -isha or -ishvara to their names.
  5. Shaiva ascetics are already noted by Patanjali in the second century BCE.
  6. The Shiva Purana's surviving chapters are no older than the tenth to eleventh century.

scholarship origins absorption

How it is told, place by place

Base telling · Scholarly

Scholarly consensus (Flood, Nath, Kramrisch)

Pan-India All traditions

Historians of religion draw a line between the Shiva of worship and the Shiva of history. On the historical side they see a slow gathering: the Vedic Rudra, a fringe god whom Flood suspects of non-Vedic roots, is lifted to sole lordship in the Shvetashvatara Upanishad; in the following centuries, as Vijay Nath puts it, countless village and regional gods became Shiva simply by taking an -isha or -ishvara ending on their names. Ascetics devoted to him appear in Patanjali's grammar commentary of the second century BCE. The Puranic Mahadeva, with his full family and his temple map, comes later still, and even the Shiva Purana's oldest surviving chapters date from around the tenth century. None of this touches the tradition's own account of him as unborn; it explains the shape of the record, not the god.

Shiva — Wikipedia; Rudra — Wikipedia; Shiva Purana — Wikipedia; The Presence of Siva

Sources: Shiva — Wikipedia; Rudra — Wikipedia; Shiva Purana — Wikipedia; The Presence of Siva

More stories with the same people